MS Word特殊尋找或取代

 目次

尋找 範圍字元 [ - ]

尋找 "(U+0022), '(U+0027) 直角引號或省略號

尋找  (U+FE50-U+FE6B) 小寫變體

尋找  (U+FE30-U+FF4F) 中日韓相容形式

尋找造字

尋找大量連續空白

尋找取代半形括號為全形括號

尋找選擇性連字號 ¬

註記

參考資料

尋找及取代 萬用字元 (WordMVP)

 

   摘錄自MS WordMVP 

Finding and replacing characters using wildcards

Article contributed by Graham Mayor, with thanks also to Klaus Linke

https://wordmvp.com/FAQs/General/UsingWildcards.htm

Contents

Overview

The theory   1. ? and * 4. [ ] 7. { }   2. @ 5. \ 8. ( )   3. < > 6. [!] 9. ^

The practice

Tips for advanced users (原文超連無效；先跳至下節再回轉)

Gremlins to be aware of (for advanced users)

  

讓萬用字元更very powerful.

 

 you can define ranges [], groups (), repeats @, {}, anchors < > and exceptions !.

Note: Word uses “lazy” pattern matching: this means it will quit matching as soon as possible.

→實務上有何影響？

使用秘密：以類型 (pattern)為標的

中文實例及說明參見 MS Word 尋找及取代 第1-12課 及 第1-13課。

#wildcard

MS Word 尋找及取代

 筆記

【Word教學】第1-10課：介紹最好用的尋找及取代｜尋找及取代(1)

https://home.gamer.com.tw/artwork.php?sn=5502707

一、介面介紹

二、使用介紹 

1. 尋找的介紹。

2. 取代的介紹。

3. 特殊的表達法。   (3) 分行符號「^11」、「^l」。

【Word教學】第1-11課：尋找及取代的搜尋選項｜尋找及取代(2)

https://home.gamer.com.tw/artwork.php?sn=5503476

介紹的是「搜尋選項」和「到」頁面。

被跳過的「使用萬用字元」將會在下一篇單獨介紹。

【Word教學】第1-12課：萬用字元怎麼用？(上)｜尋找及取代(3)

https://home.gamer.com.tw/artwork.php?sn=5504366

在勾選「使用萬用字元」後主要會發生兩個變化。

1.  1. 「大小寫須相符」、「全字拼寫須相符」、「前置詞須相符」、「後置詞須相符」、「全半形須相符」這五個無法勾選。其中「大小寫須相符」、「全半形須相符」這兩個是變成固定開啟。
2.  2. 部分「指定方式」有變動，有些是勾選後無法使用，有些是改變名字。比如說「^p」、「^g」無法使用，「^?」變為「?」。

使用介紹

2. 0或更多字元「*」。

要記住「*」的前後都要有字包著才不會有範圍過大的問題。

3. 字首「<」。

這個就是無法勾選的「前置詞須相符」。

4. 字尾「>」

這個就是無法勾選的「後置詞須相符」。

5. 範圍內的字元「[]」。

大小寫有區別，[A-Z]和 [a-z]結果不一樣。[A-Za-z]所有大小寫英文字母。 

「[0-9]」為搜尋所有數字，記得0是在最前面的。

「[一-龜]」(U+4E00 - U+9F9C)為搜尋所有中文字。（精確的說應是所有的「中日韓統一的表意文字」，另有擴充A、相容的等區塊漢字不在其中）

 如何尋找「龝(U+9F9D)」開始的漢字？

附加用法是在中括號內部的開頭加上「!」，驚嘆號是「不等於」的意思。比如說「[!a]」，就是所有不為「a」的字元。 [!A-Z] 大寫英文字母以外的字符。

【Word教學】第1-13課：萬用字元怎麼用？(下)｜尋找及取代(4)

https://home.gamer.com.tw/artwork.php?sn=5505075

6. 發生次數「{a,b}」。

a 和 b 是為了方便說明而給的代號，實際輸入時是要輸入數字。

就和它的名字一樣，是用來設定要尋找的字出現的次數，a 代表的是最低幾次，b 代表的是最高幾次。a 的最小值要是 1，b 必須大於等於 a，b 省略不輸入就是無限大的意思。

用法是放在該字元後面，比如說「ap{1,2}le」，這串的意思是「p」這個字出現1次或2次的話就會被找到，可以找出「aple」和「apple」。

→A. 和「8. 運算式「()」」配合可為詞/字組，B. 最大值只到 255。

8. 運算式「()」。

這個是要和「取代為」做搭配的，並且不受任何限制，可以和所有的功能混用，像是「[]」、「*」等等的。

用法是用小括號「()」包住內容，比如說「(麻)(糬)」，每個括號都有一個編號，編號就是它是第幾個括號，以上面的例子來說，包住「麻」的括號的編號是1，包住「糬」的括號的編號是2。

注：成對括號用 Courier 較清晰。 

例 

「尋找目標」輸入「([0-9]{7,7})[0-9]{3,3}」
「取代為」輸入「\1XXX」，這樣就可以保留「0912345678」的「0912345」，並將「678」給改為「XXX」了。

 

編號1 內容不動； 圖取自網頁

「\(」尋找「(」(左半形括號 )

「\)」尋找「)」(右半形括號 )

【Word教學】第1-14課：尋找及取代的練習題目｜尋找及取代(5)

https://home.gamer.com.tw/artwork.php?sn=5508217

7題題目，可以 `點我` 下載，底下的是題目說明與解答。

待研究：Word查詢和替換萬用字元(完全版) 

http://llai.cm.ntu.edu.tw/media/1876

尋找 unicode?

如何清除 TOC Jason tab

問題：如下圖(1)

取自解法1

解法：

1. Word: Getting rid of the ‘Jason tab’ in a TOC

https://cybertext.wordpress.com/2010/07/12/word-getting-rid-of-the-jason-tab-in-a-toc/ (2019/04/21)

修改TOC功能變數內容，加入 \w。

 \w  Preserves tab entries within table entries.
       保留表格(目錄)項目中的索引標籤項目。

並不保證全部可解。

開關說明(switch)

Customizing your table of contents with switches

http://wordfaqs.ssbarnhill.com/TOCSwitches.htm (2019/04/21)

An almost useless switch(幾乎無用的開關)

The \w switch, according to Word’s Help, “preserves tab entries within table entries.” If you have a tab character in every heading at a certain level, you may find this useful. Without it, the tab character is preserved in the table of contents entry, but it doesn’t act like a tab; that is, it doesn’t advance the text following it to a tab stop; instead, it just inserts space roughly equivalent to three normal spaces or an em space.

With the \w switch, the tab character behaves as expected; if no other tab stop is set, it pushes text to the default right tab stop where the page number would normally be (the page number, if any, winds up on the next line), but you can set a custom tab stop in the TOC style for that level, and the tab character will align the following text there. If the heading doesn’t contain a tab character, though, the page number will end up at the tab stop you set instead of at the right margin. This switch is therefore of dubious usefulness unless you have a heading style that invariably includes a tab.

2. Whenever I update my Table of Contents it acquires unwanted tabs, and I have to press Ctrl+Q to get rid of them

https://wordmvp.com/FAQs/Formatting/TOCJasonTabs.htm (2019/04/21)

巨集解法

作者認為這是一個bug

"Jason tab"一名可能出自恐怖電影《13號星期五》連續殺人魔 Jason Voorhees 


索引的解法又有不同，沒有 \w 開關。

參考資料

功能變數代碼：TOC (目錄) 功能變數
  TOC功能變數 英文文章

word參考資料

• 推薦收藏】實用Word使用技巧大全，論文報告就靠它了  (2019/04/14)

http://nccuea.pixnet.net/blog/post/42882359-實用word使用技巧大全，論文報告就靠它了

資訊蠻豐富
可以每次看個幾條或尋找需要者來看

缺點是段落及項目區隔不清，可複製到word內稍加整理再看。

如何產生索引（WordMVP譯文）

如何產生索引卡及利用 word 索引輔助功能

How do I generate an index in Word? (我如何在word產生索引)

Article contributed by John McGhie

目次
Making an Index

    Planning the Job , 12 pt 

    Types of Index(索引類型?)                   , 12 pt

    Mark-up Indexes (標註索引), 12 pt 

   Indexing Made Easy (7步), 12 pt

Page Number Conflation, 14pt

See!  It isn't that hard, 14pt

The Microsoft Word Help suggests that you can automatically generate an index.  Sorry, but you can't (the "result" looks like an index, but the reader can't use it).  You canautomatically mark index entries: however, the amount of work required to edit the result into a useable index is usually double the effort required to manually mark the index entries one-by-one.

Instead of automatically generating something that is not useable, the reader would far prefer you to express the document electronically and provide a free text search. A free text search serves the reader's needs far better than a badly-constructed index, and the search engines available these days are smart enough to look for what the reader“wanted” rather than what he or she “asked for”.

Making an Index

An experienced technical writer wrote this article. As a technical writer, I produce long documents running to thousands of pages of technical material. Indexes are part of my game. I can't tell you how to produce one automatically, but I can tell you how to produce one easily!

Before 1990-ish, Indexing was a profession of its own; in addition to an Author and an Editor, a large book had an Indexer. Even today, if you are making a book such as a medical encyclopedia that is going to remain in print for many years, it is simply stupid not to use a professional indexer. Really good indexes are an even mix of science and art form, and the quality improvement a professional makes is well worth paying for. Of course, few of us these days work on publications that are going to last long enough to justify this effort. And even fewer of us have the time to produce such an index. If you do have the time, obtain a copy of “Indexing, The Art of” by G. Norman Knight (Allen & Unwin, ISBN 0-04-029002-6).  Norman Knight is a former President of The Society of Indexers, and his book is simple and charming. Reading it, you will soon realize that indexing is not difficult; it simply takes attention to detail and patience.

Planning the Job , 12 pt

Word has one of the nicest and most powerful index generators around built right in, so you have all the tools you are going to need. You need to allow a week per 500 pages to generate an index in a technical book. Technical publications are fairly “information dense”. Scholarly monographs and the like are usually quicker to index.

Types of Index(索引類型?)                   , 12 pt

In the old days (say, 1995 or thereabouts!) indexes were all produced by the “shoebox” method. They literally used a shoebox into which they inserted index cards: three-inch by five-inch cards upon which they wrote the index term and its page number. The Indexer would sit with a large pile of “galley proofs”, single-page images as they were returned from the typesetter, and go through each one line-by-line seeking and recording the index terms. At the finish, they typed the index out with its page numbers and sent it off to the typesetter for publication.  There is a software tool specially built for indexing that emulates this process exactly. I tell you this simply because, in certain circumstances, this method is still the best today.  If your document is going to be published from a different computer to the one it is being created on, and that machine cannot interpret Microsoft Word XE tags, and you do not know what the page numbers are yet because the other machine is going to do the pagination, then use the shoebox method! (shoebox 鞋盒，傳統作法，跨平台) 

Word will do two forms of index: The Concordance Index and the Mark-up Index. It will also do something half-way in-between, using its “Mark All” command.

Mark-up Indexes (標註索引), 12 pt

A Mark-up index is the method I recommend.  It's quick, accurate, easy to understand, and easy to correct.  With a little care in the planning, it normally results in a very useable index.

As the term implies, you produce a mark-up index by embedding mark-up “tags” in the Word document. Word automatically looks up the page numbers at Print time and generates and formats the index for you. Study the help topic “Create an index” and all its sub-topics. This is the way I recommend.  It's the way that all good writers create an index these days. Mark by mark, page by page!  It is explained in detail below.

Concordance Indexes , 10 pt
I implore you not to waste your time with a Concordance Index for most publications. It results in a huge pile of rubbish that is of very little use to the reader. And it takes nearly as long to make as it does to generate an index properly. The Concordance Index is a hangover from the past when people were desperately hoping to produce an “automatic index” to reduce the labor. Every major word-processor will do them, and no professional writer or editor would, these days, permit one.

To make a Concordance index you make up a table of all the terms you want Word to find in one column, and the index entry you want to see for each term in the other. For more information, see “Create a concordance file” in the Word help file. But the end result is that you have every term indexed at EVERY place it occurs. Most of the mentions of a term in a book are simply passing references: what the reader wants to see in the index is only one page number; the one that contains the main topic for the term. If you send them on a wild goose chase to 20 other places first, they will think most unkindly of you.

The concordance mechanism does have its place:  It can often be used to good effect in Reference Books such as Programming Reference Manuals, where each command or function is referred to only in a small section of the text, then rarely mentioned anywhere else in the book.

For the truly adventurous… , 10 pt

Technical writers and other folk who publish seriously-huge documents in HTML may want to spend a little time learning about Concordance Indexes.  In conjunction with VBA, a concordance index is a great way to automatically generate hyperlinks in your document.  You tag every mention of each term with the concordance indexing mechanism, then use VBA to change the tags into hyperlink tags.

Indexing Made Easy (7步) , 12 pt

Here are some worthwhile hints I can give you so you do not go mad during the process: 

1.	Print a copy of the book and go through it with a highlighter, marking the items you would like to see in the index. If you are not the subject-matter expert, get someone who is expert in the subject to do this for you (the process is massively easier if you understand the subject well). Mark only places where the reader will get information about each item. For example, if you want to include “installation procedure”, you would mark “Follow the procedure below to install...” in Chapter 1, you would not mark “if you completed the installation procedure...” in Chapter 5. The first is what the reader would expect to see when he looks up 'Installation Procedure'. The second might cause the reader to come and look you up {grin}.
2.	Make some design decisions before you start putting codes in the file. The most important are: How many levels of entry are you going to allow? If it is more than three, I will personally come and shoot you! Such an Index is both unusable and unmaintainable {grin}. Are you going to reverse the terms? “Indexing, the art of” or “The art of Indexing”? Normally do the former, but whichever you select, you must do it for every entry How will you treat numbers? All as if they were spelled out; or all up the front above the “A”s? In technical books, do the second, but whichever you do, you must do it for every number. Will you use “see” references to condense the index? My vote in modern times is: “No, don't bother”. “See” references mean the reader finds the index entry, then has to go find another index entry before they can find the page. It annoys your reader, it doesn't save much paper, and these days paper is not very expensive. Will you “put the Table of Contents in the Index”? Debate rages in the more pedantic Indexing circles about this one. The pedants (sorry, “purists”) say you should not include in the index terms that are contained in headings in the table of contents. I say: “Of course you should”.  Research shows that some people (about 35 pct) look in Tables of Contents, some people (about 60 pct) look in Indexes. Few readers these days have a clear picture of the conceptual difference between them, and each reader will secretly thank you if he can find what he wants in both places. I always include an index entry for every heading in the book. So shoot me! Sort order: Word-by-word or “letter-by-letter”? By default, Word does the former. Purists like the latter: I don't; I can never find anything in such an index, and most readers hate it. So shoot me again! To produce a letter-by-letter sort, you have to place the generated index in a two-column table (page numbers in one column, text in the other).  Then copy the text column, remove the spaces from it with Find/Replace, then shift that column to all upper-case and sort by it. Then remove the uppercase column and turn the table back into text. Avoid the classic hilarity of putting “the book” in the Index. If you are writing a book called “All About Word” you may get sued for a laughter-based injury if you include “Word” as a term in the index. But for your own amusement, have a look in the indexes (not “indices”!) of a few cheap-and-nasty technical manuals such as are often produced in-house as training manuals. You will be surprised how often you see this classic faux pas. And you may immediately become suspicious that you are looking at an automatically generated index!
3.	Now run through and tag the entries you have highlighted, according to the instructions in the help topic “Mark index entries”. Unfortunately, if you have made a few indexes, you will know how to do this, and if you haven't, your first attempt will contain errors. Sorry: I had to go through this too {grin}. I will give you a hint that will save you a bit of time (quite a lot, actually...) Do not put in the subentries at this stage.  By that I mean tag each item as a main term.  If the entry does belong as a subentry, you will find that you can add the main term to the tag more simply on your second pass. A Word About Tagging:  Word's index tags are both case-sensitive and "space-sensitive".  "Installing" and "installing" are not the same thing: each will appear under its own heading.  "Administration" and " Administration" are not the same thing: one will sort right at the top of the index.  See?  When you are debugging "entries out of sequence" you sometimes have to look extremely closely to ensure that the tags really do match exactly. To enter an index tag in a heading, ensure that your headings are formatted by styles, and do not apply any formatting overrides to the heading. If you apply direct formatting to the headings that contain index tags, the direct formatting will be copied through to your Index. A colon : and a semicolon ; are not the same thing!  You use colons to divide the levels of sub-entry in your index tags.  When you are in a hurry, it is too easy to type the un-shifted character (the semi-colon) instead of the shifted character (the full colon) in the tag.  If you do, you will get some very weird errors in your generated index.  There's no easy way to find these, but the semi-colon will appear in the index.  If you have strange things happening (items that do not appear under their correct entries or sub-entries) try searching your generated index for semi-colons.  If you find any, at least you know "what" is wrong: finding the tag that produced the problem is a real chore (it will not be on the page in the index...).  Try this:  Reveal your hidden text (so you can see your XE tags) then search for a semi-colon with the font format  hidden text.  If you find any, chances are they are in your bad index tags.
4.	Now generate the index. Ignore the formatting at this stage; just print it. Leave it as a single column for ease of reference. If you have a big screen, you can open a second window into the document and look at the index that way (see the Window menu) but for most, it's easier to print the first result.
5.	Now sit down with a colored pen or pencil (you can't see blue or black against black type...) and edit the index. Mark all the terms that should become sub-entries, and show the term they should be sub-entries of.  Now run down it, and for each term, ask yourself “What else could the reader possibly call this?” Add an entry for each. Run down it again, and for each term, ask yourself “Is there anything else the reader would need to know about when looking this up?” Add a “See also” for each one you find.
6.	Go through and edit the tags in the file to implement the changes you have identified. You can find index tags easily by using the Browse buttons on your vertical scroll bar (see “Browse to the next or previous page, table, or other item” in the help). In later versions of Word (2002 and above) you can use Ctrl + G to bring up the "Go To" dialog.  Set "Go to what?" to "Field".  Set the Enter field name box to "XE".  Click Next, then Close.  Your "Previous" and "Next" browse buttons (at the extreme bottom right corner of the Word window, under the vertical scroll bar) will now go to the next or previous index entry fields on each click, until you change to something else.  If you use Find, or Browse by Find, you can specify ^d XE as your Find string to find only index tags. If you know exactly what the text of the tag is, you can use ^d XE "tag text string" to find exactly that tag.  However, this requires you to work out exactly what the tag content will be, and that's not easy three levels down in an Index.  So I prefer to use Ctrl + G, Page Number (from the index), then Ctrl + F, ^d (to find the next XE tag.  Then keep hitting Browse Next to find the tag you want.
7.	Now regenerate your index. (Click in it and press F9). You can now change it to double-column if you wish. You format an index by using Format>Style to change the styles Index 1 through Index 9. Each style controls the formatting of one level of entry.

Page Number Conflation(區間頁碼), 14pt

Page number conflation is where only the first and last page numbers appear for a topic.  In the index you see 88 - 95 instead of 88, 89, 90... --頁碼範圍, 88 - 95。建議只標註第一頁。

I am very tempted to say "don't bother"!  Tag the first instance of each term.  If your reader does not have the brains to see that the information on a topic continues for several pages, they should be kept away from your book in case they hurt themselves...  However, if you absolutely must conflate, this is the way to do it:

• Place a bookmark around all of the pages you want to conflate.  頁數範圍建立書籤
• Then place the name of the bookmark in the XE tag, Word will generate a conflated page reference for you.  

See!  It isn't that hard, 14pt

There! That's the way I do it. If you trust me and do it that way, you will find out why I do it that way. If you don't trust me and do it another way, you will find out why much sooner {grin}.

WORDMVP   How do I generate an index in Word?

“Indexing, The Art of” by G. Norman Knight (Allen & Unwin, ISBN 0-04-029002-6), 北市圖無此書，2019/02/11

word索引研究

目次

上階標題?(待定)

    索引類別

建立索引

移除索引標記

問題

參考資料

win10問題

字型

無法安裝字型

文鼎大部份無法安裝。（好像?）
文鼎中隸無法安裝

可安裝字型

華康2002一般都OK

文鼎目前只成功安裝中粗隸及特毛楷

win10可安裝文鼎中粗隸
可是在word內看到的字型名稱為"文鼎中"
在word用"文鼎中粗隸"找不到符合條件字型

字型名稱不完整

word2016 問題

問題

避頭尾計算不同

    段末

    並列
注音格式(部份解決, 2020/06/15)

華康注音體PDF顯示空白
插入標號
樣式名稱無法輸入中文(已解決, 2020/06/15)
標點符號表輸入表
頁碼方向

書眉參照
尋找全部(已解決，操作方式和以前不同。)

避頭尾計算不同

段末計算不同

2002和2016避頭尾計算不同。

"者」。" 2002/2003會在此處多一行，造成多一頁。

狀況：段末兩個標點符號"」。" 

2016在p119L11

參考檔案：18K_菩薩戒修學法要_20180722A.doc

2002 避頭尾多一行

2016

並列計算不同

狀況

2007和2002/2003並列所看到佔據空間不同。

會影響版面

(缺示意圖)

處理

"不壓縮標點符號" 可以兩個版本空間配置相同。

中文印刷樣式

不壓縮標點

注音格式

不出現預設注音(已解決)

word2016 進入注音格式，不會出現預設讀音(word2003有)。
     2019/08/28 突然有注音
有安裝注音輸入法
但簡体字有注音

好像和word及win版本都有關係

XP+word2003 預設讀音

2016注音格式 沒有預設讀音

簡体字會出現預設注音

word2016 出現預設注音

顯示格式有些問題

不好看
win10+word2016
4聲符較小問題仍在（win7就有了）
注：右側垂線時(圖例第一, 三行)，2, 4聲看起來互換了！

注音格式 顯示不佳

華康注音體PDF顯示空白

華康注音體使用在 word 2016, 2019 + win10 轉換為PDF時，顯示為空白。

同檔在 word 2002 + win10 轉換為PDF時，可正常顯示。

暫時解：到 word 2002 + win10 列印 PDF

插入標號

word 2016 + win10 問題
word "插入標號" 有時會出現英文的標號如圖的 "figure"，而不是中文的"圖表"。無法自動接續已有的序數。"figure 1"而不是"圖表 8"
如圖為 figure 1，而不是 圖表8。
重新開檔後"圖表"

和所在或所選的字元是中文或英數有關

插入標號 不正常

插入標號 正常

樣式名稱無法輸入中文(已解決)

情況

建立樣式無法輸入中文
微軟倉頡無論在中文或英文模式，輸入都是英文。
→關閉檔案再開啟就可以了。

可以使用中文，但要用複製貼上處理

疑點

因為輸入法所致？

測試

1.關閉word，重新開啟後，可以使用中文名稱。

標點符號表

沒有如2002/2003標點符號表
網路上有一些解法可是覺得不好用
利用輸入法快速鍵組合

2002/2003標點符號表

書眉參照有問題

註腳轉為章節附註（章註或文件註）時，StyleRef參照錯誤。

參照處出現文字錯誤或空白。

word2002可以正常顯示。

章註書眉錯誤(參照錯誤及空白)

書眉參照只能空白

直排頁碼方向不對

word2016用「亞洲文字旋轉270」排版時，書眉的頁碼方向無法轉到正確的方向。

頁首/頁尾頁碼方向問題

目前收到回覆

正常

2002，2007，2010

不正常

2016，2019

安卓 MS word App

2016 直排頁碼方向

尋找全部(已解決)

要將找到的全部符合規則複製/貼上至它處
按"尋找" (而不是"全部醒目提示")
同以前版本步驟，複製/貼上。

**利用尋找標示的全部醒目提示無法複製貼上至它處

尋找全部

尋找/全部醒目提示

其他處理

將目標字詞尋找/取代為目標字元樣式
再以"選取全部"目標字元樣式
注：要記得不要存檔或以另存新檔再處理

段落分頁設定效果不定

目次

問題... ２

目前解法... ４

參考資料... ６

問題檔... ６

樣式內容... ６

問題例圖... ６

注：目次連結未完成

注：轉換自 段落分頁設定效果不定.doc/htm
        →  MS Word HTML語法

問題

1.        “與下段同頁” 
無作用（3處）。如問題檔頁80, 93, 95。（例圖見 圖表 1  沒有與下段同頁(p80)）頁80「丁三、罪相輕重」是套用有設定“與下段同頁”的!01標_2階（見參考資料之樣式內容）
有作用（12處），如問題檔頁41, 48, 57, 100, 109, 114, 129, 132, 138, 144, 145, 148。（例圖見 圖表 3  與下段同頁正常(p41)）
注：有作用無作用都是套同一樣式 !01標_2階

2.        兩組情況的樣式設定及圖表之版面配置並沒有不同。（樣式設定參見參考資料之樣式內容，版面配置之比較則參見 圖表 2及圖表 4）

圖表 1  沒有與下段同頁(p80)

圖表 2  p81圖表版面配置

圖表 3  與下段同頁正常(p41)

圖表 4  p41圖表版面配置

目前解法

改版面配置的垂直位置即可。
水平位置沒有影響。

調整版面配置的垂直為” 線段”之下（圖表 6  p81圖表更新後版面配置），即為正常的“與下段同頁”效果（圖表 5  p81圖表版面配置更新後版面）

注：只有"線段"有效。其他頁、邊界等皆不符所需。

圖表 5  p81圖表版面配置更新後版面

圖表 6  p81圖表更新後"版面配置"

探索/測試

(標題 noto semibold)

1.        環境：win10+word2016, .doc(97-2003相容)

2.        P80, 標題和下頁空3行

甲、按3次enter就會跳到下一頁。

乙、調圖表前空白行為”單行間距”沒有影響。

3.        P93, 標題和下頁空3行

4.        P95, 標題和下頁空一點距離

甲、標題前少一行，標題即跑到下一頁，和後文同頁。

參考資料

問題檔

l   18K_菩薩戒修學法要_20180722A.doc

樣式內容

!01標_2階

    !01標_1階 + 字型: 14 點, 加寬  0.5 pt, 縮排: 套用前:  0.55 cm, 從左至右, 階層 2

!01標_1階

    !!版_單位行高_24.9pt_15行 + 字型: (中文) 華康中黑體, (英文)Arial, 16 點, 加寬  1 pt, 調整字距 26 點, 中東文字字型: 26 點, 粗體, 從左至右, 與下段同頁, 階層 1

!!版_圖序

    !!版_空白行_半單行高 + 字型色彩: 白色, 從左至右, 行距:  固定行高 4 pt, 與下段同頁, 階層 3

!!版_空白行_半單行高

    !!版_空白行_單位行高 + 從左至右, 行距:  固定行高 12.45 pt

!!版_空白行_單位行高

    !!版_單位行高_24.9pt_15行 + 字型: (中文) 細明體, 8 點, 從左至右

!!版_單位行高_24.9pt_15行

    字型: (中文) 華康粗明體, (英文)華康粗明體, (符號) Times New Roman, 14 點, (中文) 中文 台灣, (其他) 英文 美國, 中東文字字型: 細明體, 13 點, (中東) 阿拉伯文 沙烏地阿拉伯, 從左至右, 靠左, 行距:  固定行高 24.9 pt, 文字對齊方式: 置中

問題例圖

l   標題（!01標_2階）和圖表之間有一空白行（!!版_圖序），錨點在此空白行。（參見下圖）